Six people who anonymously trade sharp comments and occasional insults online met face-to-face Wednesday at the Colorado Springs Gazette.
No one was injured in the 2-hour meeting.
Another 47 people participated in the meeting via Internet hookup, posting 275 comments and each staying logged on for an average of 30 minutes. The two groups — those in the room and those participating via liveblog — traded questions and comments about the current state of online discourse.
Only those in the room, however, could nibble on the modest spread of cookies provided by the Gazette.
The meeting was the brainchild of Gazette columnist Barry Noreen, who had, two weeks earlier, mused about the tone of online debate at gazette.com. He struck a nerve. The comments about comments became one of the longer online discussions ever at gazette.com. Along the way, a participant wondered whether face-to-face debate would be any less heated and more productive than the flame wars that typically erupt in anonymous online forums.
Noreen took up the idea and invited folks to a face-to-face meeting, at the Gazette. The date was set and the invitation extended.
Much hemming and hawing ensued among the commentariat. Some regular participants in gazette.com forums expressed eagerness to meet the faces behind the avatars. Others, who wrote that they preferred to remain anonymous, vowed to stay away.
Wednesday evening, the Gazette doors opened and a half-dozen folks slapped on nametags with their online handles, such as Pondfrogz, Retrofunk, and Jillann.
“Do any of them have fangs and look like axe murderers?” asked an Internet participant logged in under the handle “moonshine.”
“*Laughter* no, just regular folks,” was the reply from the group in the room, whose discussion was transcribed by Gazette online staffer Jackie Myers.
That was followed by an online comment from a participant logged in as “Loring:” “I am seriously interested in attending future events if there are others. Dang, everyone sounds normal.”
That’s the way Myers saw it, too: “The discussion is fairly general… but very relaxed and respectful,” she posted.
Noreen said Thursday that future face-to-face sessions ought to be arranged. Next time, he said, computers should be made available to those who show up, so they can converse directly with those participating via the Web.





Spoiling it for everybody
July 22nd, 2009, 3:39 pm by Jeff ThomasThe News & Record in Greensboro, N.C., is up to here with the lunkheads who take online discussions into the sewer. Editor John Robinson tells readers that the news website will not permit any comments whatsoever “on stories that tend to bring in the most offensive, inappropriate and starkly off-topic comments. We’re talking crime stories, stories about immigration, and almost anything about race and sex.”
Here in the Springs, gazette.com editors already have developed a sixth sense about what kinds of stories will bring out the trolls.
Immigration is a sure firestarter. So is any move by any kind of religious institution. Sexual-identity politics. Doug Bruce. Traffic enforcement.
Red meat, all of it.
We aren’t prepared to shut down comments on stories we know will bait the trolls. We default toward more discussion, not less.
But there are days . . .
I remember former CBS newsman and now NPR commentator Daniel Schorr telling NPR’s Scott Simon a few months ago that, as the barriers to instant global communication have fallen away thanks to the internet, so has the internal discipline of communication that had forced each of us to consider what we say and how it will be received. Just as health insurance has insulated patients from the financial costs of their treatment decisions, so has unmoderated digital communication insulated us from the impact, to say nothing of the clarity, of our words. We blather. We don’t focus. We abandon grammar. We’ve forgotten how to think critically. And we don’t seem to care who gets hurt in the process.
I’m not ready to shut down the comment boards. But believe me, I understand.
Posted in: comments • library | 4 Comments »